01st Test: Day Five
Posted on November 28, 2006. No comments.
Australia wins by 277 runs
It took just 19 overs this morning for Australia to wrap things up in Brisbane and go to a 1-0 lead (click here for the scorecard). England offered surprisingly little resistance, with Kevin Pietersen gone in the first over, Jones bowled by McGrath 7 overs later, and the rest did their bit as lower order batsmen … a few swipes, and then back to the pavilion before causing too much trouble.
Australia reviewed:
For Australia, there were plenty of positives to come out of this game. Stuart Clark’s rise continues, the batting from the top six was awesome, and Glenn McGrath showed us that he still has the magic.
On the negative side, there’s the batting of Gilchrist, the impenetrable bowling from Brett Lee, and the way in which everyone allowed things to get a little out of hand when Pietersen and Collingwood went on the attack.
England reviewed:
For England, well, at least there weren’t any major injuries. The few positives include the guts and fight shown by the middle order on the fourth day, the bowling of Flintoff, and Kevin Pietersen’s haircut (no more Skunk Boy!).
The negatives are many and obvious. Stephen Harmison’s bowling improved from utterly woeful to barely Test standard, the batting and overall captaincy shown by Flintoff, the bowling from Anderson, the batting from Strauss, the presence of Duncan Fletcher, and the absence of Troy Cooley.
What lies ahead?
Australia has a few big selection issues, but they are all good decisions. Shane Watson’s not yet ready, which helps a little, but then if they want to bring in leggie Stuart MacGill, who do they get rid of? Stuart Clark, who took 7 wickets for the match? Brett Lee, Australia’s stump-destroying speedster? It’s going to be a tough call.
England probably couldn’t play any worse than they did in Brisbane, but then we were probably saying the same thing in 2002, 1999, and beyond. England will certainly improve, but whether it will be enough to get them a win in Adelaide is difficult to tell. At this stage I’d say an Adelaide win is unlikely, but then look what happened last year! Freddie Flintoff has told his bowlers to look to Glenn McGrath for an example of bowling perfection, and his batsmen have to show a bit of the determination shown by Collingwood and ‘Hollywood’. Harmy will need to get back to his best, and I just can’t see that happening, and Ashley Giles will need Panesar to keep him company, at the expense of James Anderson.
I know Flintoff is using 2005 as a source of hope, but the circumstances are quite different. If England are still lapping up past successes then they will need to quickly move on. Facing Australia in 2006 is a very, very different scenario.
Australia wins by 277 runs
It took just 19 overs this morning for Australia to wrap things up in Brisbane and go to a 1-0 lead (click here for the scorecard). England offered surprisingly little resistance, with Kevin Pietersen gone in the first over, Jones bowled by McGrath 7 overs later, and the rest did their bit as lower order batsmen … a few swipes, and then back to the pavilion before causing too much trouble.
Australia reviewed:
For Australia, there were plenty of positives to come out of this game. Stuart Clark’s rise continues, the batting from the top six was awesome, and Glenn McGrath showed us that he still has the magic.
On the negative side, there’s the batting of Gilchrist, the impenetrable bowling from Brett Lee, and the way in which everyone allowed things to get a little out of hand when Pietersen and Collingwood went on the attack.
England reviewed:
For England, well, at least there weren’t any major injuries. The few positives include the guts and fight shown by the middle order on the fourth day, the bowling of Flintoff, and Kevin Pietersen’s haircut (no more Skunk Boy!).
The negatives are many and obvious. Stephen Harmison’s bowling improved from utterly woeful to barely Test standard, the batting and overall captaincy shown by Flintoff, the bowling from Anderson, the batting from Strauss, the presence of Duncan Fletcher, and the absence of Troy Cooley.
What lies ahead?
Australia has a few big selection issues, but they are all good decisions. Shane Watson’s not yet ready, which helps a little, but then if they want to bring in leggie Stuart MacGill, who do they get rid of? Stuart Clark, who took 7 wickets for the match? Brett Lee, Australia’s stump-destroying speedster? It’s going to be a tough call.
England probably couldn’t play any worse than they did in Brisbane, but then we were probably saying the same thing in 2002, 1999, and beyond. England will certainly improve, but whether it will be enough to get them a win in Adelaide is difficult to tell. At this stage I’d say an Adelaide win is unlikely, but then look what happened last year! Freddie Flintoff has told his bowlers to look to Glenn McGrath for an example of bowling perfection, and his batsmen have to show a bit of the determination shown by Collingwood and ‘Hollywood’. Harmy will need to get back to his best, and I just can’t see that happening, and Ashley Giles will need Panesar to keep him company, at the expense of James Anderson.
I know Flintoff is using 2005 as a source of hope, but the circumstances are quite different. If England are still lapping up past successes then they will need to quickly move on. Facing Australia in 2006 is a very, very different scenario.





