The Ashes Blog

07 Jul, 2009

The Ashes 2009: a Pom and a convict give their view

Posted by: TheAshesBlog.com In: Predictions| Tests ()

I thought I’d put up a couple of different angles on how things are shaping for The Ashes 2009. First up is a review from my father-in-law, a keen English cricket fan now living in Brisbane, Australia:

I think it will be close. Neither team looks a dominant force to me, though both are capable of playing winning cricket. If the wickets favour spin, I think England will probably win, though I rate Michael Clarke and Katich as good spinners, probably better than Hauritz. But it is unlikely that more than a couple of the pitches will help spinners much.

Lee was the best bowler on show from either side in that game at Worcester. He bowled very well indeed. But I understand that he will be out for the first two tests and anyway his record in Tests in England is rather poor. Harmison was the next best and looked pretty dangerous. Johnson was fairly ordinary, though I don’t doubt he will come good.

Both sides seem to have strong tail end batting, and I rather suspect that we will see the top order of both teams collapsing at times, only to be saved by numbers 7, 8, 9 and whoever. I suspect that England will bat Prior at 6 and Flintoff at 7, with Broad (an average of over 30 in Tests) at 8. Flintoff scored 93 for his county a week or so ago, so has some batting form behind him.

With regard to Hughes, he obviously is going to be roughed up with short balls and he might find it hard going early, but I think he is too good to fail often or fail for very long.

I understand that McGrath is forecasting a 5-0 Australian whitewash. But there, he usually does. He got it right last time in Australia, but very wrong in 2005. I can’t see either side winning by that kind of margin.

The weather is very good at the moment. It was hot for Wimbledon. But English weather ….

Here are my thoughts as an Australian fan:

I also think it will be very close, though I think Australia will retain the Ashes. Australia’s strength is in its batting (see England v Australia: a comparison of Test averages), and England’s strength is its bowling, but I think the Aussie batsmen will come out on top more often than not.

Brett Lee missing at least the first Test, and probably more, is a huge blow for Australia. He was in great form, with the potential to win Test matches. If he’s only out for 1 or 2 Tests, I think Australia will do ok. But remember 2005: Glenn McGrath was only out for 2 Tests, but it was those 2 Tests that England won, and that was ultimately enough for them to win the series.

I agree with my father-in-law when he says that both sides will have a few batting collapses, and rely on their lower order to score runs. Interestingly both sides are playing bowlers who can score useful runs, and this could prove a significant issue. It will make it tough on the bowlers, who won’t be able to slacken off once they’ve taken six or seven wickets, as there’s still the potential for plenty of runs to be scored.

Phillip Hughes is a terrific player, and I think he’ll come through ok. Yes, he may falter occasionally, but as he showed us in South Africa, the guy knows how to score a good hundred. I’m expecting him to score at least one century this series. Ravi Bopara will also have some great innings, but I also expect him to get quite a few low scores (under 20). For England I’m going to tip Andrew Strauss to be their leading runscorer, and for the Aussies I’m going to go with Michael Clarke.

Reverse swing will play a big part in the Ashes of ‘09. The Australian bowlers may not be quite as experienced as the English when it comes to reverse swing, but I think Troy Cooley will have them ready. Bret Lee has obviously got it, and I think Peter Siddle could be a bit of a surprise packet in that department as well.

What about injuries? Australia has already lost Brett Lee for a Test or two, but what about England? Can they get through unscathed, given Pietersen’s and Flintoff’s recent history? I doubt it. England will suffer as a result of injuries to important players, it’s just a matter of when that happens.

What do you think? Whether you’re in the Barmy Army or an Aussie fanatic, how do you see this series and the players shaping up for the Ashes 2009?

Share this post:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
previous post: Brett Lee injured | next post: 2009 Ashes: First Test


9 Responses to "The Ashes 2009: a Pom and a convict give their view"

1 | vicky

July 10th, 2009 at 6:33 am

Avatar

hey dude nice blog about the Ashes series. But i think you have to give the live of this asesh 2009 on this blog. Then you can get more traffic. wann look the live streaming link go on Way2hight.blogspot.com

2 | David B

July 18th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

Avatar

In the English County Championship Notts are 79 for 9.
Steve Harmison has taken 6 for 20! I don’t think he liked not being selected for England.

3 | TheAshesBlog.com

July 18th, 2009 at 7:22 pm

Avatar

David B: I hope he’s got that out of his system before he’s recalled for the Third Test.

4 | Barbara Fawcett

July 27th, 2009 at 8:02 pm

Avatar

I want to watch the Ashes. I don’t want Sky. The Ashes is a National Institution. It should be free to view.

5 | TheAshesBlog.com

July 28th, 2009 at 8:15 am

Avatar

I absolutely agree, Barbara. I think England fans are getting ripped off, and should be complaining about it. Here in Australia the Ashes is available on free to air TV (thank you SBS!!).

6 | Paul Eaton

August 2nd, 2009 at 3:26 am

Avatar

I’ve no idea to whom I should direct this complaint, but I think it’s a national disgrace that the BBC is not showing the Test Cricket on free-to-air TV (and in High Definition). I even heard today that it wasn’t even bid for by them. What a shambles. As a public service it should be doing its best to encourage sport in this country. I tell you it wouldn’t happen in Australia, which is probably why they’ll win. And if they don’t then it’s a real shame that most people here will have been denied the opportunity to see England triumph. Boo hiss!

7 | Woadwunner

August 3rd, 2009 at 9:32 pm

Avatar

Phone Transcript

Intercept: 1-7-09 time: 20:20

Brrr….Brrr….Brrr….Brrr…
Umpire Rudi Koertzen?
Yes!
We have your wife and children!
We’re MI-55, and we want to win the Ashes.
Are you going to help England Rudy?
No!
What! We’ll rape your wife and slit the throats of your children?
No!
We are very serious Rudy.
No!
We’ll pee in the fish tank.
No!
Right, then we’ll shave the dog.
Oh! You wouldn’t?
Yes we would Rudy!
Bastards!
Look, leave the dog alone!
I’ll give you three wickets against the Australians.
Better be in each innings Rudy?
Mmmm….. Alright!
We’re arresting the dog till after the series.
Bastards!
Bzzzzzzzzzzzz……………….

-Woadwunner

8 | Gump

August 3rd, 2009 at 9:34 pm

Avatar

I think it’s a national disgrace the way Australia have played until this third test… it was like barracking for England… Your right the Ashes wouldn’t go just on pay tv. Whilst channel 9 (commercial free to air) use to have the right until they started stuffing around with putting it on which annoyed everyone.

So now it’s on SBS (one of the government funded channels), they are taking the English feed so it’s a bit bias especially naser hussain its even rubbing off on to Warnie admiring English players.
What is the world coming to? At least there is always the smooth Michael Holding

9 | CJ

August 20th, 2009 at 11:17 pm

Avatar

And they say Baseball is boring. How long does it take to play a test series of cricket anyway? It’s been about a month or longer and still it’s not over yet!

Comment Form

Flickr PhotoStream

    Langer and Hayden walk out to the middleRicky PontingAndrew FlintoffJustin LangerKevin PietersenDuncan Fletcher and the England cricket team plansBrett LeeMatt Hayden and Andrew SymondsAndrew Flintoff wins the toss

About

TheAshesBlog.com is the home of the re-enacted Ashes photos, where you'll find pivotal Ashes moments re-enacted in an Aussie backyard. So we might show Ricky Ponting celebrating a century, only the venue is a backyard in Brisbane rather than The Oval. And the stumps are a cardboard box. And KP doesn't really look like that in real life ... or does he?

Categories