The Ashes Blog

16 Apr, 2009

Should Michael Vaughan play in the 2009 Ashes?

Posted by: TheAshesBlog.com In: Team selection ()

Michael Vaughan, the part-time miracle worker from Yorkshire, has been selected in a 25 man squad for the 2009 Ashes series. Some people, especially writers at England’s Guardian newspaper, think that Vaughan should play regardless of how many runs he makes. Others go even further:

“There is a rumour that KP and Freddie will be rested for the Ashes if Vaughan is fit. No point risking their fitness when Vaughan is around to win the game.

Andrew Strauss might as well be shot; he is just that superfluous now. England don’t even need a coach, Vaughan is back, save your money ECB, in fact the ECB is no longer necessary, Vaughan is here to plug all gaps and make everything better.”
- Michael Vaughan is here to win the Ashes: Crikey

Ok, so that’s a bit over the top. The real issue is whether there is another capable player who can win matches batting at number 3 for England in the same way that Vaughan could. Who are the other contestants? Owais Shah (not enough runs at Test level), Ravi Bopara (batting average of 24 just not good enough), and Ian Bell (former wunderkind who has been struggling lately). With competition like that, Michael Vaughan would appear to be a near certainty, with or without his signature walking stick.

Share this post:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
previous post: Flintoff v Johnson: who would win? | next post: The Injured Ashes


3 Responses to "Should Michael Vaughan play in the 2009 Ashes?"

1 | namroz baloch

May 2nd, 2009 at 7:21 am

Avatar

vaughan is the best english batsman for more than a decade now , considering his classical innings which he played in ashes 2002/2003 , and the glorious moment in english cricket history when his captaincy overwhelmed the opposition in ashes 2005.
he must appear in the scenes again people are waiting to see him in action again to watch his classical stroke play,although there were some issues like his injury , current form but his talent just outweighs those temporary miscomings

2 | TheAshesBlog.com

May 4th, 2009 at 8:42 pm

Avatar

Namros, I agree that Vaughan has played some brilliant Ashes innings, and his captaincy in 2005 was instrumental to England’s win. But is it enough to focus on the past when looking towards the future?

He is an injury waiting to happen, and his form of late has been, well, inconsistent. But perhaps England has no other viable option. I agree with you … unless another standout player arrives who can do England proud batting at number 3, then Michael Vaughan would seem to be the ideal player.

Let me be honest: as an Australian fan, I would still prefer NOT to see Vaughan play. In other words, he’s your man.

3 | Gunna

May 17th, 2009 at 8:07 am

Avatar

If I never see Vaughan’s smarmy smerk again, it’ll be too soon. He’s definitely overrated. Come on England, I know you revel in your ancient history, but we’re talking The Ashes 2009 here. Get real.

Comment Form

Flickr PhotoStream

    Langer and Hayden walk out to the middleRicky PontingAndrew FlintoffJustin LangerKevin PietersenDuncan Fletcher and the England cricket team plansBrett LeeMatt Hayden and Andrew SymondsAndrew Flintoff wins the toss

About

TheAshesBlog.com is the home of the re-enacted Ashes photos, where you'll find pivotal Ashes moments re-enacted in an Aussie backyard. So we might show Ricky Ponting celebrating a century, only the venue is a backyard in Brisbane rather than The Oval. And the stumps are a cardboard box. And KP doesn't really look like that in real life ... or does he?

Categories